Skip to main content

Comment: The Economist's Special Report on Globalization


With protectionist and isolationist sentiments rising around the world, this week's special report on globalization by The Economist is timely and well worth a read.
Yes, globalization has left many behind, particularly those working in the manufacturing sector of wealthy Western nations. A growing body of research shows that for those who lose their jobs to trade, the negative effect can persist for a lifetime.
The benefits of trade are often more diffuse and felt less acutely. Yet, in the aggregate, a decrease in prices, increase in consumer choice, and gains in efficiency more than compensate. Indeed, as the report notes, it is the poor, not the rich, who stand to lose the most purchasing power when borders are closed.
The report also suggests that much-maligned economic migrants don't compete with native workers so much as they complement them. Skilled migrants are net contributors to the welfare system, and unskilled ones satisfy labor requirements not met domestically.
For those who have lost their livelihoods, the report presents solutions—including wage insurance and retraining schemes—that governments would do well to heed. Weak action so far has incubated the discontent that created demagogues like Trump and Farage.
We need an open world. This case is closed.


Comments

  1. It is really amazing...thanks for sharing....provide more useful information...

    Education
    Technology

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Tax Reform India Needs

Image: Tizi A version of this article also appeared in the South China Morning Post's Young Post on Thursday, May 5.  http://yp.scmp.com/news/features/article/103398/india%E2%80%99s-economy-taking-right-steps-goods-and-service-tax India’s current prime minister, Narendra Modi, was elected in 2014 on his economic credentials and the promise that he would bring to the nation the same prosperity he brought, as chief minister, to his home state of Gujarat.  The keystone of Modi’s economic policy is a nationwide goods-and-service tax (GST), intended to streamline the myriad state and central-government levies currently encumbering business in the country.   Under the prevailing tax regime, multiple layers of tax are imposed on the same good, and interstate trade is complicated by varying tax rates between states. Transporting goods across state borders can entail long waiting times to resolve tax matters, and the plethora of obscure charges leaves ample r...

The State and the Stock Market: Risky Business

Image: Washington Post   Up, up, and up, with not a glance below. In just 12 months, the frenzied Chinese stock market gained a staggering $6.5 trillion in value. Many sold their homes, quit their jobs, and took loans in a manic effort to join the invincible bull run. Less than 12 weeks since, trillions of dollars in stock market value has evaporated in a precipitous slide that is spooking investors around the globe.  Following close to half a decade in the doldrums, the Chinese stock market took off spectacularly in the summer of 2014. Shares were being traded higher and higher with unrelenting pace. Nascent companies with paltry profits staged wildly successful equity offerings. One tech company, Beijing Baofeng Technology, saw its shares rise 17-fold in just 26 trading days.  Worryingly, the rally showed no signs of slowing even as the economy progressed sluggishly. With the steep ascent looking excessive, the government should have made an attempt to h...

Flawed Theory and the Endowment Effect

Image: Youkai Chou It's a happy day. Through some divine stroke of luck you have found yourself with two free tickets to the Rugby Sevens / insert-event-you-want-to-attend. What should you do? Is it a better idea to sell your coveted tickets to the highest bidder or to take along a friend and have a good time? What's a reasonable way to think about this decidedly pleasant dilemma?  Homo economicus , the imaginary friend of every economist, may have some advice for you. So who is  Homo economicus ? He is the relentlessly optimising, perfectly rational, purely self-interested character   who serves as a model for human behaviour. Numerous core economic theories are formulated through the study of how this creature would behave and interact under certain conditions. Fortunately, for economists and everyone else, humans are indeed often rational actors. For instance, the central economic tenet that, all other things being equal, an increase in th...