Skip to main content

Making Welfare Work Better

Image: YP/Reuters
A version of this article also appeared in the South China Morning Post's Young Post on Thursday, April 28. http://yp.scmp.com/news/features/article/103333/hong-kong-wealthy-city-yet-more-million-are-living-poverty

Asia’s financial capital has a poverty problem. There is no doubting that. According to Hong Kong government figures, between 15% and 20% of the population lives below the poverty line, defined as half the city’s median annual income of about HKD 180,000. In Hong Kong, sky-high rents and limited space mean that poverty poses particularly acute difficulties. With insufficient public housing, many of the impoverished live in dangerous, and often illegal, subdivided flats. Others still are forced to live in cage homes. 

Hong Kong’s social welfare program, the Comprehensive Social Security Assistance (CSSA), is notoriously ungenerous. Payments are as low as HKD 2,000 per month for a single, healthy adult. That’s a mere one-seventh of the median monthly wage. The paltry sum is not nearly enough to maintain a reasonable life in the city.    

What can be done to improve the system? It could be argued that Hong Kong’s welfare model is superior to that of many developed countries such as the United States. In such “welfare states”, a Byzantine system of entitlements and benefits often creates a disincentive to work and has led to mounting government debt. 

This lack of incentive to work is particularly strong for those with low earning potential. Every dollar of income means a dollar less in welfare; those who believe they cannot earn significantly more than their welfare benefit often will not try to enter the job market. In Hong Kong, on the other hand, one cannot live purely off welfare, and all able-bodied recipients are required to actively seek full-time employment.

Hong Kong should not emulate the welfare state model, but it does have options. One is the earned income tax credit (EITC). The EITC, which is used in the United States, offers a tax rebate to working individuals making less than a defined sum of money. By offering a rebate, the EITC does away with the disincentive to work—the benefit can only be availed if there is taxable income. Raising the EITC is widely seen as favorable to raising the minimum wage, as the former does not increase the cost to companies of hiring workers. 

A more far-reaching alternative is the negative income tax. Here’s how it works: take an individual whose income is HKD 5,000 a month. If positive income taxes start at HKD 15,000 a month, and the tax rate is set at 20%, this individual will be paid 20% of the difference between his income and 15,000—in this case, HKD 2,000 a month. The concept is attributed to Milton Friedman, the renowned economist who was a champion for free market values. He saw the negative income tax as the best way to reconcile free-market ideals with the moral imperative to help the needy. The negative income tax provides an incentive to work and also supplements those who cannot earn enough. 

The most radical proposal is for a guaranteed basic income. Instead of myriad welfare benefits, the government would provide a cash transfer to those below a minimum income threshold. Proponents say that the policy will be crucial to protecting the large numbers of people projected to lose jobs as a result of advancements in artificial intelligence and the automation of even white collar jobs. 

Many fear that a guaranteed income would create a strong incentive to quit work. However, the limited studies conducted so far show minimal reduction in hours worked when income is guaranteed. Many postulate that this is because the necessity to earn money is not the sole reason for working—many find fulfillment through their work too. Additionally, by abolishing other welfare benefits, the guaranteed basic income makes welfare administration less bureaucratic and costly.

What is best for Hong Kong? Unlike the vast majority of governments in developed nations, Hong Kong’s runs a consistent budget surplus despite low taxes. The government currently holds reserves of over HKD 800 billion and had a HKD 73 billion surplus in the 2014-2015 fiscal year. The government can afford to experiment with welfare policy. 

A negative income tax and a guaranteed basic income may be politically unpalatable as they call for a fundamental restructuring of the tax and welfare systems. A generous expansion of tax credits and income supplements may be more tenable. Clearly, something must be done. A city with Hong Kong’s wealth, and a government with its financial war chest, cannot accept that over a million are languishing in poverty.   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On Myanmar

This is adapted from a paper I wrote for my Comparative Politics class at Harvard . A Friendless People Thousands have been killed. Hundreds of thousands have fled. They are a people without a home, much less a state. Such is the plight of the Rohingya, whom a UN spokesperson once called the most friendless people in the world. The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights has called the situation a “textbook example of ethnic cleansing” (“UN”). This latest wave of state-sponsored violence follows a series of attacks by militants—a small insurgent group, the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA)—in August on Myanmarese military outposts. The brutal military crackdown is ostensibly targeted at insurgents. Yet, it is unmistakably civilians who are bearing the brunt of the violence, with the UN High Commissioner calling the response “clearly disproportionate” and “without regard for basic principles of international law” (“UN”). The approach of ethnic institutionalism has

The Tax Reform India Needs

Image: Tizi A version of this article also appeared in the South China Morning Post's Young Post on Thursday, May 5.  http://yp.scmp.com/news/features/article/103398/india%E2%80%99s-economy-taking-right-steps-goods-and-service-tax India’s current prime minister, Narendra Modi, was elected in 2014 on his economic credentials and the promise that he would bring to the nation the same prosperity he brought, as chief minister, to his home state of Gujarat.  The keystone of Modi’s economic policy is a nationwide goods-and-service tax (GST), intended to streamline the myriad state and central-government levies currently encumbering business in the country.   Under the prevailing tax regime, multiple layers of tax are imposed on the same good, and interstate trade is complicated by varying tax rates between states. Transporting goods across state borders can entail long waiting times to resolve tax matters, and the plethora of obscure charges leaves ample room for co

Where Lurks the Next Crisis?

Photo: SCMP Optimism flows freely through the markets today. Asset prices are at record highs: investors are happier than ever to throw money at barely profitable technology companies, debt issuances from dubious companies and volatile governments, and anything blockchain related—from Bitcoin to Ethereum to Insanecoin, which does actually exist.     Most observers think that the coin mania is a bubble waiting to burst. But bears have been calling the whole market a bubble for a while, predicting an end to the years-long economic recovery and stock market boom. The old joke goes that economists have called seven of the last two recessions. It still rings true. Doomsayers have been convinced of a market crash since the post-recession recovery had barely gotten on its legs. But with things as they are today, are we on a path toward crisis?   I will not engage in the perilous business of trying to predict when the next economic downturn or market tumble will occur. Any such p