Skip to main content

Wells Fargo Debacle Again Shakes Confidence in Wall Street

By
Image: YP
In another blow to Wall Street’s reputation with the public, it was recently uncovered that Wells Fargo employees had created over two million fake accounts for customers in an attempt to meet ambitious sales targets. The bank is to pay USD 185 million in fines and 5,300 employees have been fired. 

Wells Fargo CEO John Stumpf was hauled before incensed lawmakers on the Senate and House banking committees late last month to testify on the matter. He has agreed to forfeit USD 41 million in pay and to end the banks controversial sales incentive program that purportedly led to the illegal behavior. Lawmakers lambasted the banks activities as akin to theft, and condemned what they saw as a weak reaction from Stumpf in handling the situation.

Stumpf insisted at the hearings that the problem was not with the company culture, but rather with a set of dishonest employees. However, with 5,300 employees involved in the scandal, it is difficult to claim that there was not a more systemic issue at play. 

This is scarcely the first time that big banks have been on the hook for unscrupulous practices. Following the financial crisis, several banks were widely criticized for their role in precipitating the crisis and inflicting massive financial losses on their customers and the general public. A number of banks are still settling nine to ten figure fines stemming from that time. 

This particular episode promises to again reignite questions about the degree to which banking should be regulated. It is also a useful study into the power of incentives, and the difficulty in creating incentives that will elicit the desired response. 

Texas Representative Roger Williams, a Republican, told Stumpf, “I came to Congress to deregulate and because of your actions it’s really making it difficult for me…” Those on the fiscally conservative side of the spectrum do feel the need to loosen regulations they see as onerous and inefficient. 

Milton Friedman, the twentieth century economist known for his impassioned arguments against government interference, might argue that banks engaging in unethical activities would ultimately lose customers over time, thus creating a natural disincentive against misconduct. As it happens, there tends to be a lot of inertia in banking: Wells Fargo executives have noted that there have not been a significant number of customers looking to suspend their relationship with the bank. 

In a perfectly efficient system, Wells Fargo would be punished through a loss of business; in reality, this is unlikely to occur. Thus the need for regulation and less reliance on the elusive self-correcting nature of such industries.

In addition the scandal also highlights something that economists have observed time and again: incentives often do not work as planned. What almost certainly compelled the 5,300 employees to knowingly break the law and create the fake accounts was a rigorous sales incentive system put in place by the bank. Those who felt they were falling shy of their performance targets felt incentivized to take illegal action in order to save their jobs. The consequence for the bank was that a program put in place to increase revenues has ultimately led to a massive financial loss and an even larger dent to its reputation. 

Regulations and incentive systems are complex, and it is challenging, if not impossible, to predict how humans will react to gain a reward or prevent a loss. The answer is neither overregulation nor no regulation at all; it is not to create fewer incentives or ever more complex ones. Rather, what is required is a delicate balance that fosters the human desire to succeed and limits the opportunity immoral behavior in the pursuit of success.

A version of this article appeared in the South China Morning Post's Young Post on Thursday, October 13. http://yp.scmp.com/over-to-you/columns/article/104602/wells-fargo-debacle-shakes-confidence-wall-street-%E2%80%93-again

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Harmony in the Middle Kingdom

By
Image: Wikimedia Commons The four decades since Deng Xiaoping spearheaded “Reform and Opening Up” in China have seen growth on a scale unparalleled in modern history. Where hundreds of millions were once destitute, extreme poverty has been all but cast into the annals of history; the world competes to attract the wealth of China’s burgeoning middle and upper classes. Analyses of the country's explosive growth are aplenty. Real GDP has grown 64-fold, literacy is above 95%, and in a once Communist country the private sector, at least on paper, now accounts for 60 percent of economic activity. This piece, however, will look more at the stability of the country—while analysing potential economic factors underpinning this. A number of scholars predicted political and economic instability in China as nation rapidly became prosperous. Yet, in a country transformed, political and economic durability remain. The Chinese Community Party continues to enjoy high levels of popular leg...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Myanmar

By
This is adapted from a paper I wrote for my Comparative Politics class at Harvard . A Friendless People Thousands have been killed. Hundreds of thousands have fled. They are a people without a home, much less a state. Such is the plight of the Rohingya, whom a UN spokesperson once called the most friendless people in the world. The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights has called the situation a “textbook example of ethnic cleansing” (“UN”). This latest wave of state-sponsored violence follows a series of attacks by militants—a small insurgent group, the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA)—in August on Myanmarese military outposts. The brutal military crackdown is ostensibly targeted at insurgents. Yet, it is unmistakably civilians who are bearing the brunt of the violence, with the UN High Commissioner calling the response “clearly disproportionate” and “without regard for basic principles of international law” (“UN”). The approach of ethnic institutionalism...
Post a Comment
Read more

Where Lurks the Next Crisis?

By
Photo: SCMP Optimism flows freely through the markets today. Asset prices are at record highs: investors are happier than ever to throw money at barely profitable technology companies, debt issuances from dubious companies and volatile governments, and anything blockchain related—from Bitcoin to Ethereum to Insanecoin, which does actually exist.     Most observers think that the coin mania is a bubble waiting to burst. But bears have been calling the whole market a bubble for a while, predicting an end to the years-long economic recovery and stock market boom. The old joke goes that economists have called seven of the last two recessions. It still rings true. Doomsayers have been convinced of a market crash since the post-recession recovery had barely gotten on its legs. But with things as they are today, are we on a path toward crisis?   I will not engage in the perilous business of trying to predict when the next economic downturn or market tumble will occ...
Post a Comment
Read more